Back
in the day things were much different than how they are now. In some cases
people were allowed to do things without severe consequences. Over time though
the country has went through the creation of amendments and laws that citizens
must learn to follow. For example Amendment VI gave us the right for the
following, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to
a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district
wherein the crime shall have been committed...” (U.S. Constitution). The
amendments in the constitution are the base for the government in the United
States, but the constitution is well dated, and more and more is it being
overlooked. In the United States there
used to be laws prohibiting substances like liquor and alcohol. As time went on
these laws were changed, and yet changed again. Along with alcohol came the
consumption by men, women, and even children. Before the drinking age was lower
and in place of this then came larger numbers of fatalities. So the age in
which you were able to obtain the element went up, but in modern day so has the
number of times this law is broken. It doesn’t matter though if it is drinking,
smoking, or even speeding, people are going to break the law, so I ask the
question should the drinking age be increased or decreased?
In
the United States prohibition was focused on the manufacture and sale of
alcohol, although drinking was never illegal. Prohibition was a major movement
from 1840 into the 1920s. The sale of alcohol was made illegal by the
Eighteenth Amendment. (Prohibition). The
Eighteenth Amendment section one states “After one year from the ratification
of this article the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating
liquors within, the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from
the United States and all territory subject to the jurisdiction thereof for
beverage purpose is hereby prohibited.” Section two went to say that “congress
and the states have the power to enforce this law through appropriate
legislation.” (U.S. Constitution). Although “sale of alcohol was illegal many
people kept private bars to serve guest. Large amounts of alcohol were smuggled
to the United States by Canada, land, and sea. (Prohibition). The Eighteenth Amendment
was ratified in 1919, but was then repealed fourteen years later by the twenty
first Amendment in 1933. The twenty first Amendment states in section one that
the Eighteenth Amendment is hereby repealed. Section two, states “The
transportation or importation into any state, Territory, or possession of the
United States for delivery or use therein of intoxicating liquors, in violation
of the laws thereof, is hereby prohibited.” (U.S. Constitution). From this
point on the drinking age was low, until 1980 when the Mothers Against Drunk
Driving organization was introduced.
Mothers Against Drunk Driving also
known as MADD, was an organization introduced on May 7th of 1980 by
Candice Lightner with the mission to stop drunk driving and to support the victims
of crimes, while trying to prevent underage drinking. The blood alcohol content
also known as BAC used to be .10, but the MADD program was in favor of the
blood alcohol content being lowered to
.08 when the topic came about. Since the creation of Mothers Against Drunk
Driving the organization has come up with an “Eight-Point Plan”. Within this
plan some hopes MADD has is to resuscitate efforts to prevent impaired driving,
increase enforcement, set seatbelt laws in every state, reduce underage
drinking, and increase beer tax. (Mothers Against Drunk Driving). In 1984 the
organization had its biggest success when the National Minimum Drinking Age Act
was established. Although it wasn’t long before between 1970 and 1975 some
states had lowered their legal age with the passing of the twenty sixth
amendment which had changed the voting age from twenty one to eighteen. When the
National Minimum Drinking Age Act took place, it enforced that you had to be at
least twenty one to buy and drink alcohol, under this new law if the states
didn’t agree they would receive a ten percent decrease in annual federal
highway funds. (National Minimum Drinking Age Act). With these changes there
also came a raise in vehicle fatalities. By 1988 all fifty states including
Washington DC had raised the minimum age back to twenty one. Although the
raised drinking age helped solve fatality problems, it has not helped the fact
that underage drinking still exists. (National Minimum Drinking Age Act).
Research presented during the hearing about the implementation of the national
minimum drinking age act In October of 1992, 20.7 million seventh to twelfth
graders were recorded while 10.6 million of them were listed as students who
drink. Of that 10.6 million, eight million students drink weekly, but students
drinking patterns are reason for concern. 2.7 million students drink to feel
high or when bored, while 3.3 and 4.4 million students drink alone and when
upset. (Implementation). It is simple to know that alcohol is easy to pick up.
If you know the right people then it comes just as easy, but two out of three
students can’t distinguish alcoholic drinks from non-alcoholic drinks. The
content in which some beverages contain is also unclear to students. Less than
one in six students were able to identify the drink which contained the highest
amount of alcohol. (Implementation).
Everybody grows and matures over
time, but the maturity level between an eighteen year old and a twenty one year
is much different depending on the individual. When you turn eighteen you are a
legal adult, and adults should have the right to make their own decisions. There are things that you can do when you turn
eighteen that you couldn’t do before such get married, vote, be tried as an
adult for a committed crime, buy cigarettes, lottery tickets and even serve for
the country. (Drinking Age Pro-Con) Although it would be simple to say that we
should be able to drink from our eighteenth birthdays and on, you have to think
about what the accident and fatality rates would also change to. Fatality rates
when the drinking age was eighteen were high, but so are the rates when you
first turn twenty one. Not all countries are like the United States for having
age twenty one, some drinking ages range such as Italy where the legal age is
sixteen. (Legal Drinking Age). In Italy it is said that the kids who drink at
the dinner table with their parents are less likely to binge drink as adults,
and if they did decide to become heavy drinkers it wasn’t until they were
older. Youths in other cultures learn to drink more reasonably; because drinking
is a normal standard and exposure comes when you are younger. (Blue). When you
set a rule to make drinking illegal it only causes more problems, kids look to
do it because they are being “sneaky” and breaking the law. Would changing the
drinking age law be effective for the nation? Some may argue yes, while some
also may argue no for favor of keeping age twenty one. Yet at the same time
maybe increasing the drinking age from twenty one could be a possible solution.
It is common sense that the older you get the more you learn, as well as the
more mature you become. So say the drinking age is risen to twenty five because
in reality twenty one is not working. Adolescents, students, and young adults
drink anyways. “a strong belief of mine
is that the drinking age should be increased. I don’t believe that at the age
of twenty one most people are mature or responsible enough to handle drinking”
(Palatine). I have found that I agree with this statement. Today many people
are immature about a lot of things, and if they cannot handle themselves how
are they going to manage alcohol.
In conclusion, I think over all the
drinking age should be eighteen. You gain adult responsibilities and why should
you be limited in the one area, I do understand that if the age gets lowered
then there will be an increase in high school drinkers and school grades will
suffer, while more younger children will begin drinking because it will be
easier to obtain. No matter what the age is there is always going to be
problems, and I think that the government should make a decision and go with it
to see what the outcome turns out to be.
Works Cited
Blue,
Laura. “Italian kids who drink with Meals are less likely to grow up as
binge-drinkers.” Time
19 Aug. 2010: Web. 20, Nov. 2012.
CBS
News. n.d. Web. 20, Nov. 2012
Daniloff,
Caleb. Drinking: 18 VS. 21. 21, Oct. 2012 Web. 27 Nov. 2012
“Rethinking
the drinking age: Making it illegal to drink under the age of 21 isn’t working.
Would lowering the age offering
education on safe help?” 20, May 2009. Web. 20, Nov 2012.
Implementation
of the National Minimum Drinking Age Act. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1992. Print.
Legal
Drinking Age. 19 Nov. 2012. Web. 20 Nov. 2012.
McCardell,
John. “Atlantic Monthly.” Points of View Reference Center Home 2009.
Minton,
Michelle. “The Legal Drinking Age Has Not Been Effective.” National Review. 20 April. 2011.
“Mothers
Against Drunk Driving.” Wikipedia. 25
Nov. 2012. Web. 28 Nov. 2012
“National
Minimum Drinking Age Act.” Wikipedia. 25 Nov. 2012. Web. 27 Nov. 2012
Ogilvie,
Jessica Pauline. “Pro/Con: Should The Legal Drinking Age Be Lowered To 18?”
SIRS 30. May. 2011. 19, Nov. 2012
Platine,
H. Lianne. “Drinking Laws.” 21 Jan. 2008. 20. Nov. 2012.
“Prohibition.”
Wikipedia. 25 Nov. 2012. Web. 28 Nov. 2012.
Toomey,
Traci L. Toben, Nelson F. and Lenk, Kathleen M. “The age-21 minimum legal
drinking age: a case study
linking past and current debates.” Policy Case Studies (2009).
Watkins,
Christine. “Lowering the Drinking Age Could Reduce Underage Alcohol Abuse.” Alcohol Abuse 2007.
U.S.
Constitution. Art./Amend. VI, XVIII, XXI.
No comments:
Post a Comment