Political Cartoon
Political cartoons are a popular way to express
personal option. Political cartoons have been around for many years to show all
different sides of politics and what people feel is right and wrong about them.
Right now in 2012 is a big time for political cartoons because of the new
presidential election, there are numerous cartoons about both Barack Obama and
Mitt Romney it’s not very hard to find a cartoon that gets your attention no
matter what side of the new presidential election you’re on.
A political cartoon that has grabbed
my interest is the cartoon that shows Mitt Romney out hunting but is holding
his gun backwards. The animals are mocking Romney and talking about his story
that he spent the summer shooting wolverines that were attacking his cousins,
and two dogs saying that ‘they don’t think this mutt Romney knows what he’s
doing.” The holding the gun backwards and the animals just standing around
watching him really makes him look like he doesn’t know what he’s doing. There are literature traits in this cartoon,
some are easy to spot and some aren’t as easy to see.
When it comes to traits this cartoon
doesn’t have very many because the cartoon is pretty straight foreword when
looking at it. These traits have lots of similarities. Context of this cartoon
is that Mitt Romney is out hunting and is holding his gun backwards but has
told stories that he spent the summer shooting wolverines. So this shows that
Romney might be a story teller and is just lying to persuade people into voting
for him. Exaggeration of this cartoon is holding the gun backwards while out
hunting and Romney acting like he knows what he’s doing. Irony in this cartoon
is the story of him hunting that he told. When he says that he has been hunting
before but doesn’t know how to hold a gun.
The biggest and most obvious symbol of the cartoon is holding the gun
backwards.
“They must come to conclusions, but
at the same time they must recognize the right of other men to come to opposite
conclusions.” (Institute for propaganda. New York. Harcourt, brace and company,
1939) This sentence is saying that someone may think that someone else is
wrong, but has to come to a conclusion that the other person might be right.
This relates to my cartoon of interest because people might say he’s a liar
because of the way he’s holding the gun but he might not be in the wrong
because he could have been making a statement about hunting and someone might
have took it as him saying he knows about hunting. I think it just proves,
never judge a book by it’s cover.
No comments:
Post a Comment